this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
198 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

7130 readers
332 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We would still need an executive position. There would be no savings.

[–] Splitdipless@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In fact, if Canada goes with a "President," it would cost more. Just on the election alone, but then they will also need an enlarged staff for their political works. Also, electing a President has really been working out well elsewhere, like the USA, hasn't it?

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We could have a President that is ceremonial like the Governor General now. Which means this hole thing would be pointless just to change the name of some position.