Lemmy Moderation Tools

266 readers

9 users here now

Welcome

I'm working on a moderation tool to work with Lemmy.

I'm still in early development and discovery. This channel will update the status and respond to questions during development, testing, release, and post-release.

You are encouraged to create posts defining your needs. I also appreciate feedback on status updates. This helps me maintain the right track.

Join us on Matrix!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

jgrim@discuss.online

Beehaw's mod tool needs (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 year ago by Lionir@beehaw.org to c/lemmy_mod_tools@discuss.online

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here's a laundry list of sort with tons of tools we'd like to see

Role for approval of applications (to delegate)
Site mods (to delegate from admins)
Auto-report posts with certain keywords or domains (for easier time curating without reports)
Statistics on growth (user, comments, posts, reports)
- User total
- MUA
- User retention
- Number of comments
- Number of posts
- Number of reports open
- Number of reports resolved
Sort reports
- by resolved/open
- by local/remote
Different ways to resolved a report
- Suspend account for a limited amount of time rather than just banning
- Send warning
Account mod info
- Number of 'strikes' (global and local) and reports
- Moderation notes
- Change email
- Change password
- Change role
Ability to pin messages in a post
Admins should be able to purge
Filter modlog to local
Better federation tools (applications to communities, limiting)
- Applications to communities to allow safe spaces to exist (people should not be able to just "walk in" on a safe space - similarly to follow requests in Mastodon in a way)
- Limiting (Lock our communities down from certain instances but still allow people using our instance to talk to people from those instances)

Obviously considering the moment when this is being made - federation tools are our highest priority.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] towerful@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand that emails are optional.
However, if a user wants to recover their account, then they should provide an email (even just a burner).
It's not much, but it would add an extra safe-guard against admin abuse.
Mod logs could show "mod changed email for user x" without any PII. Which would add some insight into potential admin abuse if this happened excessively or if a user complained about it happening to them.
I imagine any admin with postgres skills could delete/suppress the modlog entry tho.

Personally, I wouldn't trust any website if I contacted them with an "I've locked myself out" request, and they replied with a new password.

TL;dr: Regardless, I don't actually have any skin in the mod/admin game.
I can understand that it seems useful.
I am still of the opinion that it is an outdated way to do account recovery.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No way to validate it is actually the user if they're locked out... mod shouldn't be able to change email either, but realistically they can do that to the db if they want to. Your info exists on their server, so they can change your password too. Anyone could disable/enable these kinds of tools that automatically notify, ultimately you shouldn't sign up for an instance you don't trust.