Technology

23 readers

2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago

Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by readbeanicecream@kbin.social to c/tech@kbin.social

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google accused DOJ of aiming to force people to use “inferior” search products.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hoodlem@hoodlem.me 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mehta even appeared briefly confused by some of the references to today's tech, unable to keep straight if Mozilla was a browser or a search engine. He also appeared unclear about how SEM works and struggled to understand the options for Microsoft to promote Bing ads outside of Google's SEM tools.

This is not the first thing I have heard troubling about judge Mehta regarding this case. He also ruled that it would not be considered that Google employees and executives purposely destroyed evidence related to the case. It’s not a good sign for the antitrust argument with a judge like this.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We definitely need technology judges and legislatures with a history in the industry or robust training. They make and rule on the laws and they don't even understand the subjects they're legislating.

[–] Midnitte@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

They need the judge that heard the Google Oracle API case - actually seemed to understand the implications of copyrighting APIs