this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
1029 points (95.9% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2189 readers
624 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BeefDaddySupreme@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's always been that way though

[–] AJT@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Almost exclusively, in fact.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

Not to this degree. Musk is the richest person ever to have lived. He’s got more money than most nations on the planet have ever had, comparatively. His wealth, power, and influence are obscene.

His wealth is currently growing at $14.75 million per hour. He could spend a million dollars every day for a thousand years and still be the richest person on earth.

I don’t think many people can fathom how extreme his wealth hoarding actually is. It’s literally mind-boggling. He could single-handedly solve the hunger crisis planet-wide and make a huge impact on the climate crisis, but instead he uses his money to fellate himself, take credit for others’ work, and ruin things.

In the past, kings and barons have only wished to have the money and power he wields, and this is what he’s doing with it. It’s absolutely shameful.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

nah, it's a relatively new thing, like only found after ww2.

[–] mob@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think so. For example, isn't it believed that Rothschild was a large contributing factor to The War of 1812?

I'd imagine a lot of those "old money" families dabbled throughout history

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

isn’t it believed that Rothschild was a large contributing factor to The War of 1812?

By anti-Semitic conspiracy circles, yes. By anyone who has looked into these claims without being a conspiracy nut, no.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quite a few supporters for independence in America's revolutionary war against England were quite wealthy, and stood to make very good money with an independent US. Hancock was one of them.

I don't know if I'd say that was the entire reason for the war of independence, but I think it was substantial enough that we can consider it an example in this case.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, it is not, just because there was an economic incentive for some people during the revolution doesn't mean that it is comparable, if you want comparable, imagine if the of the richest Italians had replaced many of the American cannons with wooden fakes

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's somewhat comparable since the economic incentive was heavily skewed towards leadership vs the common person.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

no, because the leadership actually did the fighting, unlike musk who just shut off service when daddy Putin asked him to