this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
2110 points (96.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9659 readers
551 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 164 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is the propaganda I can get behind.

And with trolleybuses powered on a renewable grid, it's zero gallons!

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 78 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or maybe tell bosses that if your job can be done remotely it should be done remotely. Then there's more room on the bus for people who need to be in meatspace to do their jobs.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only bosses were open to persuasion.

[–] lugal@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah, tell it my boss. I had this conversation today with her.

I wish I didn't need hands for my job, 90% of it is brain work with a tinker here and there. I see so many videos of robotic hands being used for things and can't wait for the day I can just send one of these out to a site equipped with some tools and just remotely tap into the video stream. It's coming and I don't think it will be too long. Hell, I'm just a layman and if you gave me a dedicated year and some funding I could get something viable up to par so I'm sure it's possible, guess it just won't profit anyone enough to sell it yet.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We used to have trolleybuses when I was a kid in the 70's, they were so insanely much more nice to ride than a diesel. No bad smell, and they were smooth and quiet.

I guess we will get back to something similar soon, but with batteries.

[–] kurosawaa@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's still a shame because the batteries are less environmentally friendly than the old trolley busses.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes in some aspects, it's like we are moving backwards. Funny since the talk about environment is more serious now than back then, still we often use unnecessarily polluting solutions, where the older "too expensive" solutions were viable when we had way less money as a country than we have now?

One would have thought the oil crisis had made us keep the trolley busses?

[–] odium@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

While I agree with the comparison in the post, the trolleybus powered by renewable energy shouldn't be compared to gas cars.

It should be compared to electric cars powered by renewable energy.

[–] Lutz69@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I disagree, the bus is still replacing the purpose of the gas cars. The bus should just be compared to both gas and electric cars.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

It is easier and cheaper to make one larger electric vehicle than 68 smaller ones, and they would damage the road less too. Of course this kind of comparison between two different things is inherently very difficult to do fairly

[–] uis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Trolleybuses are much lighter, cheaper and reliable than regular electric bus or car. Also: a car is still a car.

[–] odium@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Ik that ttolleybuses are better than electric cars in carbon footprint, traffic, etc. I'm just proposing that we compare things with the same power source together. It makes more impact to say that an electric trolley is x% better on y metric compared to electric cars, than to say they are x% better than gas cars.

Imagine a situation where you say electric trolleybuses are superior to gas cars for reasons x, y, and z on xcretion or speddit. Then some elon musk bootlicker or big oil bootlicker replies to you saying "what about electric cars" or "what about gas buses"? You craft a meticulous reply about why gas buses are better than electric cars. But it's too late. Thousands of lurkers saw the bootlicker's reply to you but will never see your rebuttal. Many of them are now more against public transportation.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

How are buses still not better? The ratio of individual people being moved to total mass being moved is better. The maintenance and insurance fees are collective. The driver of the bus is a trained professional vs some rando commuter.

[–] moitoi@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Nope, a car electric or not creates multiple issues like urbanism, pollution (i.e: noise, visual, microplastics), hotspots, hostiles environment like parking lots, increase deaths rates, consequences on flooding, etc.

A lot of them can be solved with public transportation.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Trolleybuses are great. Fuck Sobyanin.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

New electric buses in London are fucking amazing, no need for trolleys.

[–] uberrice@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Until in 5-10 years when the batteries are fucked.

That's the beautiful thing about trolley buses - they do not need a (substantial) battery. They are basically trains on wheels.

There are some places where battery powered buses make sense - for example, where I live, lucerne Switzerland, there is one bus line that just goes up and down a rather steep hill. By using recuperative braking, the battery powered bus is super efficient. For other, normal 'high traffic' lines, trolley makes so much more sense

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trolleys don't really make any sense. I come from Riga, it has a lot of trolleys and the city is designed around trolleys and trams. And yet modern trolleys have bloody diesel engines, because being permanently hooked to the wire makes no sense at all. It's much better to have electric buses with a few overhead wires here and there to fast charge on the go.

[–] uberrice@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Lucerne has a few trolley lines. They are ONLY trolley buses. The long, 3 Segment ones. Then, some 1 Segment hybrid buses that have pantagraphs. At the end of those lines, there is a longer stop where the trolley lines end, the pantagraph gets pulled down and the bus trucks along the last few stations with diesel.

Then theres just normal hybrid buses for more rural lines, and a battery operated bus that goes up and down a hill.

There's a solution for every line - you just need the proper infrastructure. The reason that we have this great pantagraph-compatible infrastructure is that, while there are a lot of trains in Switzerland, there is no metro. So in lucerne, the trolley buses work almost as a metro, with the main lines having buses every 7 minutes.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... why not have as many cables as possible so you can simply minimize battery size? Trolleybuses are just more efficient battery buses.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cables are expensive and dangerous. Why have them at all?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Batteries are also expensive, and how are cables dangerous? We use them for trams without issue.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People die from touching cables quite regularly.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have literally never heard of it, and considering how ravenous media is for engagement that makes me rather dubious of that claim.