this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
170 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
582 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lostmypasswordanew@feddit.de 39 points 1 year ago (13 children)

It's much more banal. YouTube is simply a monopoly abusing its market power. People would use alternatives if they existed.

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (12 children)

They exist!

  1. Peertube
  2. Odysee
  3. Rumble Above is just a few of them.
[–] lostmypasswordanew@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They are not alternatives because they don't have content. Streaming video is fairly trivial. Having content is not.

[–] Syrup@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 year ago

I'd say content is trivial, but having the sheer variety of content that youtube has is not. Odysee has some decent stuff on there- even some decent original stuff that isn't just a mirror of someone's youtube channel. But it's not going to have the same niche, specific content I might look up on youtube.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)