Work Reform

9997 readers

187 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

Higher wages for underpaid workers.
Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
Better and fewer working hours.
Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

seeCseas@lemmy.world

tintory@lemm.ee

TinMod@lemmy.world

1750

Bernie Sanders Champions 32-Hour Work Week With No Loss in Pay (www.commondreams.org)

submitted 1 year ago by eee@lemm.ee to c/workreform@lemmy.world

305 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As part of his Labor Day message to workers in the United States, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday re-upped his call for the establishment of a 20% cut to the workweek with no loss in pay—an idea he said is "not radical" given the enormous productivity gains over recent decades that have resulted in massive profits for corporations but scraps for employees and the working class.

"It's time for a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay," Sanders wrote in a Guardian op-ed as he cited a 480% increase in worker productivity since the 40-hour workweek was first established in 1940.

"It's time," he continued, "that working families were able to take advantage of the increased productivity that new technologies provide so that they can enjoy more leisure time, family time, educational and cultural opportunities—and less stress."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Deftdrummer@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Nah, the vast majority don't want gun control. All you city slicking fools who don't value personal self defense and think someone else will save you.

You can piss your rights away I'll keep mine.

[–] Armen12@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

100%

[–] deadtom@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You've already pissed enough of my rights away thanks.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

They don't need someone to save them, because cities have less gun violence per capita then rural areas. All those guns don't save you. And I say this as someone from a small town.

[–] foo@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is the USA so dangerous that you need to be walking around armed to the teeth?

[–] Riyosha_Namae@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because basically anyone can get their hands on any gun they can afford with minimal difficulty, and the police have no legal obligation to protect you.

…Though to be honest, guns don't really help that much.

[–] Riyosha_Namae@reddthat.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're not the majority.

[–] Deftdrummer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

K friend. Surround yourself with liberal echo chambers and so that groupthink really reitineeates your point. Fucking retard.