You know, I've gone back and forth on 4 but given it's not a high trafficked route for buses or anything (only the 20 and 6 use it I think) I think 2 might work well enough (and I know DoTE wouldn't propose it if it couldn't given their history on the Liberty road diet.) Heavy traffic is mainly for FCC games and Music Hall events and FCC shuts it all down from the curve up to Liberty anyhow so not a huge loss IMO.

And understood about the median but if we went with a 2 total lane solution (with bumpouts too) then crossing the entire width would be extremely easy as it were. No need for a big median at all then.

[–] omeara4pheonix@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IDK, I think we are in for some rough traffic if 75 entrances are reduced (something I wholeheartedly endorse) and we put all the major arteries on a diet. IMO, give cars their their ways in and out of the city and start reducing the amount of cars on the local and residential streets. My dream would be for the entire length of vine south of Clifton Ave to turn into something akin to 16th Street in Denver. Pedestrian and bus traffic only. And I don't think we will get to that point any time soon if people feel like they need jump over to vine to avoid central. I'm fine with letting the cars keep central and reading. I could be convinced to attempt diverting the central traffic to linn. But that street would need a major rehab and no one would take that bait if the west end stays divided from the rest of the city.

I get what you mean about the median, but I don't think bumpouts are enough on a street with that much traffic, even with only one lane each way (look at Hamilton Ave to see why). Plus the median holds space for future streetcar expansion or busways that have their own right of way.