this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

14 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
 

I was having a discussion about this with a friend recently.

Back in the days of yore, fighting games would have brand new "versions" that would be repackaged with flashy names and multiple characters. These games often had yearly release cycles, or sometimes even biyearly cycles (MvC3, in particular) and there were obvious problems with this. People felt like they were "left behind" on older versions if they didn't choose to upgrade and it would make purchasing options for any outsider very confusing (especially if the games had confusing sub-titles, looking at BlazBlue!) The cherry on top: People outside of the fighting game sphere would perceive these new games as a "rip off" even if the value of the package wasn't a question to die-hard fans. An example would be Super Street Fighter IV launching with 10 new characters and 5 new stages for 40 dollars -- a price that is basically in-line with modern "seasons" in the worst case scenario and it can be debated that it was actually a great value when you consider all of the additional work and polish to other UI and gameplay elements.

Since roughly 2016, these practices have shifted radically. Now, games often release new characters as part of "seasons" where roughly 5 characters are released over the course of a year -- one character at a time.

So my question: Has this been effective in getting you to relaunch the game after taking a break?

My personal opinion is that this new release cadence has been a bit worse for my ability to play and enjoy fighting games after having a break. Often, I find that my biggest issue is that there's no longer a "good time" to hop back into the game.

When you only release 1 character every few months, every new update causes a vast majority of the player base to play the new character for a few days. This means that trying to play the game online will either result in a series of mirror matches or cases where you're playing against the same character consistently. This wasn't an issue when new "versions" of the game would release, as the number of new characters would often make match-ups diverse since all characters would be new simultaneously. Inversely, if you wait too long, you'll be playing against an already dried up player base of the same people who would normally play the game.

Lastly, I feel like the "new game" feeling has been completely removed, where seasons hardly make the game feel like a whole new product. There have been some pleasant surprises, like booting up Guilty Gear Strive to find a much nicer, polished looking main menu compared to launch. However, these types of changes are few and far between. Additionally, some parts of the game don't seem to change ever like the in-game UI or refinement of existing characters' gimmicks.

So what's your take on this. Do you think this new release cycle has been helpful or hurtful when it comes to regularly revisiting fighting games?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gordon_Freeman@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I only buy fighting games when they launch the complete edition with everything included (at least all the characters, I don't care about the cosmetic extras that I will never use). Since I don't play online (I suck at fighting games so playing online it's a waste of time, but I still like the genre) I'm pretty much unaffected if the online is active or not