this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1203 points (86.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9629 readers
816 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JulyTheMonth@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not necessarily i don't know about the situation all arouns the world but in atleast the herman speaking countries we have the concept to buy flats like one would buy a house and own it. So not all of it is owned by the same person. You still have the house maintainer which looks after the infrastructure but afaik you don't pay them rent.

[–] Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.com 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah I'd say it's pretty normal all over Europe, it might just be a common case of Americans being weird.

The type of arrangement I'm used to, property of the building is shared among the owners of the flats, who vote on how to run it in an assembly. They also appoint (and pay for) the maintainer you spoke of, but their role is more centered on overseeing/administering the building, handling paperwork, hiring contractors and such. Also, even for very large flats you end up paying a couple hundred euros a year for their services, so it hardly compares to rent.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have em in the US too. They're called HOA's. Most get a bad wrap for being ran by shitty people/busybodies with nothing to do but fine other homeowners. All condos have em here.

The problem, in the US, with the picture is that a condo would cost you pretty much the same as a house with a yard so why opt for the condo at all. If they were cheaper I would own one to live in now VS just trying to save to buy a house since they're all expensive.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

More supply would fix that.

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Canadian condos are like that, generally individually owned and there's a condo board made up of residents that deals with management of the building. I don't know of many buildings that are mostly owned by corporations in Toronto.