this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1203 points (86.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9629 readers
448 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you elaborate? What about stating that I do not have the choice for noise isolated apartments demonstrates that I object to good, affordable apartments near me ?

[–] w2qw@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

There's nothing that differentiates "affordable" apartments those at that aren't except the amount that are available. Maybe you aren't a NIMBY but a lot do use similar arguments and then start on about heritage protection.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, hence my utter confusion at being associated with NIMBYism or being oblivious to the feedback loop or contributing to the problem out of ignorance. I'm stating that the only choice in a lot of places where I live in the US is a shitty, loud apartment/condo or a house with peace and quiet.

I don't object to apartments but I do object to the general concept of apartments always being superior to the general concept of a house and that anyone who objects is part of the problem. Bad solutions, like shitty apartments, aren't solutions. They can actually push people away from real, good solutions.

Ultimately it comes down to Capitalism Bad, even more Bad with (inevitable) regulatory capture. I don't think "the powers that be" are interested in providing good solutions so we aren't going to use "market forces" to make things any better.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you agree that well-constructed apartments/condos should be part of the solution, then you're not a NIMBY. Unless you're saying they should be the solution somewhere away from you(r backyard) of course.

I understand the dilemma between a bad apartment and a good house, but that shouldn't be the dilemma, and more housing helps prevent that. Better regulation too.