this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
808 points (85.5% liked)

Memes

45546 readers
1245 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 121 points 1 year ago (24 children)

I don't want to sound like an incel, and I like eating vag/salad as much as the next guy, but imagine this image with the genders reversed

[–] Franklin@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

IMO either party doing this is fine as long as it's discussed and within the comfort bounds of the people in the relationship.

I think the problem is an expectation when there has been no discussion about whether or not it's within someone's limits.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 62 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I have no issue with oral sex between consenting adults. But this meme would not be as well received if the genders were reversed. It's hard to even imagine someone posting "always be there for your man in a time of crisis" with the woman going down on the guy.

[–] Franklin@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can only speak for myself but I wouldn't really mind it the other way around as long as there's no implied use of force or manipulation.

[–] Absolutemehperson@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feel free to reverse the genders & post this on twitter then. Getting banned from the internet speedrun any%

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Twitter = the internet

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I believe "consenting" is key here.

The reason why it's taboo if the genders were reversed is because there is a long and well documented history of non-consent when genders are reversed.

Was there non-consent where gals are forcing guys? Very likely. However what evidence I've seen suggests this is dwarfed by guys forcing gals.

[–] Yoru@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

im gonna post a reversed version of this im really curious what'll happen

[–] Damage 1 points 1 year ago

The difference is always that men (usually) have the strength to force themselves on women, the latter don't. If this guy didn't want to go down on her, he could just stop.

In broad strokes.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

part of the joke is the reversal of the stereotype.
breaking stereotypes = good
enforcing stereotypes = bad

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes i imagined it, very nice. Whats the next step?

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I love you and I'm saving this.

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree that it would look quite different with the genders reversed. However, gender equality is not like mathematical equality, where every situation needs to be reversible.

Women have traditionally been less sex-positive and less dominant, which many consider indicators of a lack of true gender equality, so a progressive community will celebrate a reversal of that.

[–] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Bad behavior is still bad behavior, regardless of who's doing it. The oppressed engaging in the same behavior as their former oppressors is not equality, it's just more oppression.

[–] 1847953620@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But situations regarding the handling of power dynamics and standards of consent/coercion absolutely should be reversible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nothing wrong with a consenting partner

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 year ago

Yes, but not quite the point I was making

[–] Batman@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess the problem is the assumption that the man is consenting. A meme is not a place to go for realistic depictions of sex, though. I think this one is playing off that to create conflict/engagement.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It's a joke. People lost their sense of humor

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone here will pretend they would be fine with it now that you called out the hypocrisy. Or they'll argue men deserve it as some kind of "payback", in which case it's really not about equality of course.

[–] deus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, they'll argue that men deserve what as a form of payback? Cause you're phrasing it like there's some kind of discrmination or persecution against men going on here and I fail to see it.

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It doesn't have to be persecution to be sexist and therefore hypocritical in a culture that claims to be opposed to sexism. I'm personally fine with a joke like this, I just also happen to think that if the characters in this one were reversed there would be all sorts of outrage and accusations of toxic masculinity.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

What would be the issue then? 2 consenting people can show each other what they want sexually, no matter the gender

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be fine in a porn comic, but provoke a scandal in a "regular" memes community

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

In my mind she has a cock. She also is built like an amazon, so she can just lift me up and flip me round for some standing 69. Nice

[–] Touching_Grass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Its the internet. No imagination needed

load more comments (14 replies)