this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
1067 points (94.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21180 readers
860 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    what is beautiful is political. Valuing art based on beauty is political. Maybe your friend is ugly. Maybe they are not, and that’s why the portrait was done.

    The act of creating is expressing power, and the expression of power and choices about who and what is valued is the core of “political.”

    It isn’t always a clear cut thing, sometimes it’s a deeper philosophical idea and much less on the surface.

    Maybe “political” is too far and “a collection of choices that reflect and potentially propagate culture or societal beliefs.” Is better.

    Being able to make a choice is power. However small. And politics is all about power. Art is all about choices.

    [–] AccountMaker 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I mean, sure, but that absolutely devalues the meaning of the word. Absolutely every single thing you do is preceeded by a choice to do that, and choices are reflective of ones inner self, and if making a choice is power, and politics is all about power, then every single thing you do is political. Waking up before sunrise is political, waking up later is political, saying hello to your neighbour is political. Recording a guitar riff that just sounds cool is political. I created croissants yesterday, that was political.

    Words are created to be used, and "political" cannot be used in any meaningful way if it refers to everything. While you probably could soundly argue that a child drawing random lines with crayons is political, it's really pointless since it's just pedantry that doesn't add value, but rather devalues the word.

    [–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I did agree that using that word is probably going to far. I was merely trying to elaborate on the sentiment you were rejecting.