Steam can refuse a refund after that time, but they are usually incredibly flexible because a) they want to keep customers on Steam and b) many jurisdictions have much firmer and consumer favoured laws around product refunds, Australia for example is a large reason for Steams current refund policy in the first place.

[–] Seraphin@pawb.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

imo refunding after 10 hours is not the right thing to do, and could undermine the whole refund system if it becomes a common thing people do.

The original idea for allowing refunds for digital games (or anything, really) is if you get a broken or defective product. If the game won't launch, or it's a buggy unplayable mess, or not what was advertised (and I'm talking blatant false advertising, not some vague speculative comments) you get a refund. If you simply don't like the game, then you need to own it that you made a bad purchase and move on. It happens.

This is why it's important to wait for reviews and actual gameplay on YouTube/Twitch first, so you have a much better understanding of what you're getting. Hell, this why YTers/streamers get free codes on release, so their audience will see the game and want to go buy it.

It's been said a million times over but I guess it needs saying again: STOP 👏 PRE-ORDERING 👏 VIDEO 👏 GAMES

[–] hangonasecond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I agree with your points around not preordering, or waiting for reviews etc. However, I disagree with you that refunding after 10 hours isn't the right thing to do for a few reasons.

First, the size of the game in question. For a short, 10-20 hour story driven game, a refund beyond 2 hours is ridiculous. For a large, open role playing game, where somebody spent 120 AUD expecting to get 50-100+ hours of gameplay, 10 hours is perfectly reasonable if you're really not enjoying the product. If I can send back a meal at a restaurant that I've had (relatively speaking) two bites of, I should be able to refund a game the same way.

Second, again speaking for Australia as a jurisdiction, is the behaviour of brick and mortar stores. I can purchase a physical copy of a game, play it non-stop for two weeks, and get a refund. They have no way to know I finished it three times, but strong consumer protection laws enable me to game the system like this. I agree that it's the wrong thing to do, but Steam is aware of the fact that the same consumer protection laws apply to them. While they have enough information to stop people from outright gaming the system, Steam needs to balance that against driving people to other storefronts or back to physical retailers.

Finally, your premise that people can't reserve the right to get a refund just because they don't like something. I would agree with this, if game demos were still a wide practise. I can't get a change of mind refund on a shirt I buy in a physical store most of the time, but I can try the shirt on in the store to see how it looks on me. I can get a change of mind refund on most shirts I buy online, because I have no idea how it's going to look. Yes, you can wait for reviews and watch gameplay, but it's always different when you actually play the game. At the end of the day, it still comes down to "I thought this game would be X but it's actually Y".

A firm, inflexible refund policy in my mind achieves the opposite of what you are looking for. If people can never get a refund because a game simply isn't what they thought, what barrier is their to a mildly successful company ridiculously overpromising, securing the bag, and disappearing into obscurity? If everyone buys the game on Steam and can't get their money back, the company has won in the short term. If 50% of preorders get refunded, the company has just lost all of that money.