this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
350 points (97.8% liked)

Canada

7133 readers
451 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So BlackRock can buy it and rent it out to people for $3,000 a month? What use is more housing if rich people who own 1,000 houses are just going to buy it? The solution is more complicated.

[โ€“] SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The solution is complicated because people can't agree on the problem.

As with your comment and subject of the article there is plenty of people that are perfectly happy with the housing crisis as long as the remain to the favourable side of it.

[โ€“] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Partly because it varies regionally, but there are definitely some consistent threads woven across the country that could be pulled.

If there is too much inventory the price for rent will go down.

[โ€“] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

I don't think that will happen. The empty houses problem is probably much exaggerated, since it gives less returns then renting them out.