this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
580 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3306 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Joe Biggs, a Proud Boys leader convicted of seditious conspiracy who the government says "served as an instigator and leader" during the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, was sentenced to 17 years in federal prison on Thursday.

It is among the longest sentences in Capitol riot cases. The record is the 18-year sentence given to Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes, also convicted of seditious conspiracy, after prosecutors sought 25 years in federal prison in his case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hogger85b@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He will get out on feb 2025 when president trump pardons all of them.

And I say that as someone that will.vote democrat, I just recognise reality

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Trump won’t pardon them. He hates his base more than we do. He only pardons people who are on a level that allows to them to help Trump personally.

Also, I’m pretty damned cynical, but I still think there is less than a 50% chance trump wins. Unfortunately 49% is very uncomfortable.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They tried to help him, the problem is they failed. Trump doesn't like losers who can't even pull off a coup.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He failed. If he actually wanted a successful coup he should have organised his merry band of idiots. But since everyone involved is completely feckless, Trump included, that was never going to happen.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

He might've succeeded but he needed plausible deniability. His lsckeys have gone to prison in droves but nothing has ever stuck to him because he's... Careful? Or at least his lawyers are.

[–] n0m4n@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

$2M was the going rate for a pardon, IIRC.

[–] stevieb@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I believe he'd absolutely pardon them. Not because he cares about them, but because it would "legitimize" his claim that the election was stolen. Or just because it would be a distraction for people to talk about while he does whatever he wants.

[–] Hogger85b@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It would be useful for him to pardon them so he has a new army and people are more willing to fight for him in 2029

[–] athos77@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

I mean, Hilary Clinton had like a 72% chance of winning in 2016 ...

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If New Hampshire decides he's ineligible for the primary because of his past bullshit, it'll absolutely start a domino effect of other states doing the same.

I'm not american, so I'm not sure, but doesn't that mean if he literally can't be the republican candidate if too many states say no?

I mean, yeah, he can run independent I suppose, but Trump's ego isn't just about being president. He gets off on having the GOP under his thumb. Once that goes away, even if he "wins" as an independent, would he even be able to accomplish anything?

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

He'll take that to the corrupt supreme Court where all of those constitutional originalists will have a sudden change of heart just like they do when the Bible they love so much says something they don't care for.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

The only thing that makes me think he might not is that he could've preemptively pardoned everyone involved in this in the dead time between the certification and Brandon taking office and he didn't. Idk why he didn't, it would have cost him nothing and made people much more likely to commit overt acts of terrorism for him a second time, but he didn't.