this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2164 points (94.4% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2943 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solstice@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I spoke with a far left friend of mine about this. His position essentially boiled down to the risk of a massive nuclear disaster outweighed the benefits. I said what about the known disastrous consequences of coal and oil? Didn't really have a response to that. It doesn't make sense to me. I'll roll those dice and take the .00001% chance risk or whatever.

[–] normalmighty@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah, nuclear is to fossil fuels as planes are to cars, safety wise. Sure it's a huge deal when an accident occurs, but that's because accidents are drastically more rare.

[–] Historical_General@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've heard some people worry that it can be used for weapons. idk.

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ironic argument for someone in a country where you can buy actual assault weapons over the counter, isn't it?

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No new assault weapons have been manufactured for sale to civilians since the 80's.

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I researched and it turns out no fully automatic weapons have been available for a few decades now. Tightly controlled. Semi automatic is just as lethal though. Also apparently the las vegas shooter in 2018 use bump stocks on his semi automatics which makes it pseudo automatic if you'll pardon the pun. Notably, the DOJ announced this bump stock reg in 2018, under the Trump administration. Interesting, but not surprising, that the insane right didn't lose their shit about "muh gunz" when it happened under Trump's reign.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Nah the reason people didn't make much noise about bump stocks is because they're terrible. They are purely something you might do for entertainment rather than any serious attempt to shoot; they really hurt accuracy and comfort.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

The term "assault weapon" is doing some very heavy lifting there. Care to define it?

[–] Historical_General@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wasn't clear they were from the authoritarian regime of Hamburgerland.

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You're right my bad. I know Americans are pretty bad about that on the Internet. I try not to be but in my defense I was thinking about that friend and projected him onto your comment.