this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2166 points (94.4% liked)

World News

39046 readers
3890 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cloud@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And what would that lesson be?

If you are interested go to their website and read what they have to say about nuclear. Climate activists do not advocate for coal and most likely live in such a way that they cause less damage to the climate than the average person, including you.

[–] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You skipped over my point. I think the activists let perfection get in the way of progress. I know that they're not advocating for coal, but by fighting nuclear they left no other scalable solution other than coal. Nuclear doesn't have to be a forever solution, but it's a perfect stop gap in the meantime.

Surely these activists contributed to progress on some other, smaller sources of renewable energy, but at the cost of decades of record breaking greenhouse gas emissions.

Nuclear could have put a halt to many if not most coal and natural gas plants until other sources of renewable energy improve and have time to get built out.

[–] cloud@lazysoci.al 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A perfect stop gap in the meantime is not a solution. Remember that coal as a piece of rock it's not a problem, the problem is caused by society relying on burning coal to satisfy its frivolous consumes. The climate crisis is not caused by activists fighting against it. Renewables could have put a halt to polluting energy the same way you claim nuclear would have, with the difference that it would have been even better because nuclear comes with other issues.

[–] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I agree with that, and I'm glad to see true clean renewables becoming a larger percentage of our energy use, but it has just been disappointingly slow.