this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
157 points (98.2% liked)

Australia

3520 readers
188 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, that's just not how greed works.

If you give a greedy person $100 in the hope they won't take a $200 bribe, they'll have $300.

Usually, they'll then try and manipulate people into giving them even more. "Well of course I took the $200. You guys only offered me $100. What did you expect?".

So you buckle and offer them $300 to not take the $200 dollars. How much does the greedy person end up with? $500 of course.

What comes next? Manipulating the new lowest bidder of course! "Well of course I took the $300. You guys only offered me $200. What did you expect?".

If they can take it all, they'll take it all. If they can squeeze you for more, they'll squeeze you for more.

There is never a point they will say "no, I already have enough". The closest they ever come is concluding "If I take the $100 now, I won't be able to take the $200 later".

Thats why this stuff needs to be properly regulated and fiercely enforced.

[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey you raise some serious points.

My argument is "give them 4% but aggressively stamp out corruption". As long as I get a legislated pay rise too in line with inflation.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, they get to decide what counts as corruption.