this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
140 points (96.1% liked)

Mycology

3065 readers
9 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/7458945

Many mushroom identification and foraging books being sold on Amazon are likely generated by AI with no human authorship. These books could provide dangerous misinformation and potentially lead to deaths if people eat poisonous mushrooms based on the AI's inaccurate descriptions. Two New York mushroom societies have warned about the risks of AI-generated foraging guides. Experts note that safely identifying wild mushrooms requires careful research and experience that an AI system does not have. Amazon has since removed some books flagged as AI-generated, but more may exist. Detecting AI-generated books and authors can be difficult as the systems can fabricate author bios and images. Relying on multiple credible sources, as well as guidance from local foraging groups, is advised for safely pursuing mushroom foraging.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't wait the see the slew of lawsuits that include Amazon as a co-conspirator.

[–] alternative_factor@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's wild that this article popped up on my feed this instant, I saw an ad for AI plant identification through your camera lens. The first thought I had was "holy shit so many people are going to die when Alexa misidentifies water hemlock as cow parsnip".

[–] d3m0nr4v3r@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tbf the same thing exists for mushrooms, there are various apps. It's dangerous to rely on them but I use them for a first idea of what I might be looking at and then go from there. Quite useful sometimes

Yeah I have nothing against the idea itself, I just know there are people out there who will trust an app 100% and never try to go from there. It's super sad really, if some people had just a little more discernment I wouldn't instantly have thought about people dying from it.

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holy shit, I hadn't even thought of that. Does Amazon have a responsibility to ensure the information it sells is at least, "commonly thought to be true"(or whatever)? What would the metric be? Who could claim jurisprudence?

IANAL, but I love the implications of case law.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

Probably not because they can afford good lawyers, but they SHOULD bear some responsibility. I think if someone actually dies because of this we might see the limits of the laws tested.