this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
251 points (95.6% liked)
Not The Onion
12295 readers
1218 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/101
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/105
Public domain, as the photos were taken by a state employee, so no one is getting sued for selling them... not for that reason, anyway.
Huh. I was under the impression that only photos from US federal government were unquestionably under public domain and state/local agencies were a different matter.
Wikipedia seems to take the position that the picture is not in public domain, and there's non-free use disclaimers on the media page.
Yeah Federal low has anything made by the federal government's public domain but that does not automatically apply to the states, and some states do retain copyright over stuff their employees produce, including Georgia apparently. Therefore the copyright is owned by the state of Georgia
Would be hilarious if they took legal action.
Sounds like there's an easy $7m on the table