this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
238 points (86.5% liked)

Games

16407 readers
1429 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"You won't find any bugs if you don't do any QA"

-Todd Howard probably

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

deletes the Jira ticket

“Problem solved!”

[–] BlueDepth9279@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nah gotta mark it as cannot duplicate then close. Gotta rack up those sweet story points.

You can't fault his logic. /s

[–] Lols@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

iirc they have focused on QA significantly more than with their previous games

[–] tal@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think that the issue is the quality of their QA. Well, okay, maybe that's a factor, but I don't think that that was the big one for Fallout 76.

Some of the issues in Fallout 76 that they shipped with, they had to know they were shipping with. It wasn't that QA didn't turn up problems, but that they took too-ambitious a plan, ran out of time, and then didn't delay the release to fix all the broken stuff. Yeah, they did a lot of work to fix the game post-release, but by then, a lot of players had already been soured by the initial bad experience.

They did significantly delay the Starfield release, so I assume that they are trying to put this out in a more-sane shape.