this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
1577 points (97.3% liked)

> Greentext

7538 readers
4 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then what's stopping post-agricultural people from being disloyal to the rich and killing them in their sleep? What makes you think the same tactics could not be used by pre-agriculture tribal chiefs to ensure loyalty among the tribesmen they abused?

[–] rurb@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Damn dude, who beat the shit out of you, took all your stuff and banged "your" women?

[–] BigNote@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

How is that going to work when you live in a group of around 30 to 50 people, all of whom are closely related either through blood or marriage, and all of whom have known you for your entire life?

What we see in all of the ethnographic literature on small-scale hunting and gathering societies is that you absolutely cannot rise to a position of power and influence simply on the basis of strength. To the contrary, the way you gain power and influence is by being a good and wise and generous provider for the group, not by beating your fellow tribe-mates down.

If you know of an example that demonstrates your idea, please do tell, since I am unaware of any such case in the existing anthropological literature.