this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
353 points (91.9% liked)

News

23311 readers
3614 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago (27 children)

I don't know which I love more: that there are still people maintaining support for the Nintendo motherfucking Wii News Channel, or that there are still people checking it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago (25 children)

You know what I hate though? That Nintendo had one of the best ideas for a console ever and then said, "fuck it, we're never doing that again." I don't even get it. It was super popular.

[–] Cicraft@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Thing is they did do that again, they just didn't show the Wii U the same love they had for the Wii

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm not entirely sure what this means tbh

[–] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nintendo didn't put as much effort in the Wii U as they did for the Wii.

Didn't think I would have to explain that.

[–] H_Interlinked@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Didn’t think I would have to explain that.

You didn't. You just repeated what the other guy said in different words, haha. I think he's looking for a little more detail. It's an 11yo console and we're not all Nintendo historians.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't need a historian to figure it out. It's a pretty simple concept.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, apparently it’s not simple because you completely missed why I said what I said. Y’all seem to have this idea that Nintendo was a victim of the Wii-U’s failure, and that it wasn’t somehow the result of their decisions. It’s like you think they didn’t develop and sell it themselves, that they suddenly appeared after it already existed. But if you want to just engage in some performative snark be my guest. I’ll be off lol

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Honestly, what I find weird is that they seem to think Nintendo wasn’t somehow responsible for the disaster that was the Wii-U. Like only had to respond to it and had no role in its failure. It’s very odd and I’m assuming it’s not the intention so I’m seeking clarity here.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

You're not that good at grasping English, are you?

[–] Mint_Raccoon@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Wii U wasn’t even remotely as financially successful as its predecessor, the Wii, so Nintendo didn’t put in as much effort. The Wii was a big hit with the casual market as well as Nintendo’s usual customers. Unfortunately, the Wii U failed to live up to expectation for a variety of reasons. One example is that much of the casual market didn’t see the need to upgrade (I suspect a lot of them, being new to gaming, didn’t really understand that the Wii U was a new console).

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I worked in a GameStop when the Wii and then WiiU dropped. The Wii had one fucking massive ad campaign. Info packets, demo units, etc. We had it all.

The WiiU initially showed up as a SKU under the Wii as an accessory, and then for the longest time, we couldn't get a straight answer as to whether it was its own thing or if it was like a SegaCD or 32x, or if it was just a new controller or what. When we got answers, it was already well into the preorder timeline and numbers were terrible, at least at my store.

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This kind of feels like a chicken/egg problem. Maybe if they put the work in it would have done better?

I mean I understand the history of the Wii-U better than you probably think, but I just find the phrasing of your statement very interesting. Because it basically says “if it wasn’t such a failure, Nintendo would have done more for it.” It kind of implies a Nintendo isn’t responsible for how it flopped and is instead a victim of it even though they’re ones who made and sold it. Like their hands were tied.

It’s very odd to me and I’m just trying to parse your real meaning, because the above sounds very silly to me.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)