this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
174 points (90.3% liked)

Green Energy

2224 readers
145 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bouh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This article is a joke of renewable propaganda. It makes hypothesis on the worst nuclear trends, and project the renewable trends, ignoring that renewables need fossile to provide consistent output. They also question each and every analysis that pretend nuclear would be good.

This is an anti-nuclear shit post.

[–] pizzaiolo 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

renewables need fossile to provide consistent output

If only we had invented energy storage!

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fiction land storage does not count.

Be specific and don’t lie with generalisations that don’t apply at scale for the grid. And don’t fan girl Lithium, it has no business case outside of extreme cases and more to the point the world does not remotely have enough.

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Also not even an advantage.

France has nuclear capacity for 550TWh/yr at nameplate for a load of 420-500TWh/yr and several neighboring countries that let them use hydro for storage.

They still produce 40-50TWh from dispatchable sources.

If storage is impossible, then we better build more wind and solar instead of nuclear.

load more comments (1 replies)