this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
104 points (97.3% liked)

Selfhosted

39939 readers
413 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I set up a new home server recently using containerized services, and I wanted to share what I learned. Nothing here is revolutionary, but this is the type of resource I wish I had when I started.

I'm open to feedback on what I could have done better!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skilltheamps@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you do some sort of versioning/snapshotting of your services? I'm on the compose route as well, and have one btrfs subvolume per service that holds the compose.yml and all bind-mounted folders for perstistent data. That again gets regularly snapshotted by snapper.

What leaves me a bit astounded is, that nobody seems to version the containers they are running. But without that, rolling back if something breaks might become a game of guessing the correct container version. I started building a tool that snapshots a service, then rewrites the image: in compose.yml to reflect what ever the current :latest tag resolves to. Surprisingly, there doesn't seem to be an off-the-shelf solution for that...

[–] akdas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't do a great job of this, but take Immich for example. There, I specify the version in the compose.yml (technically, the version is in the .env file and substituted into the compose.yml). At that point, updating Immich is a matter of updating the version number and restarting the service.

These configuration files are all managed with git, so when I do these updates, I create a new commit. I just checked, and I have Forgejo pinned to a specific version in its compose.yml as well. But unfortunately, the other services are referencing :latest. I'm going to go back and pin them all :)

[–] skilltheamps@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I built a small tool that does that for me now and published it: https://feddit.de/post/2909288 maybe you'll find it useful, no guarantee that it doesn't break something though :D

[–] NewDataEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you do that? I'm building a similar system now that automatically updates my containers. I've played around with the API and I can see which versions are attached to the latest sha265, but I can't find a way to automatically tell which version it is. Especially when the same sha is linked to multiple versions

[–] skilltheamps@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I only keep track of the sha256, compose happily uses those. I published the tool https://feddit.de/post/2909288 :)

[–] NewDataEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah ok. I thought you meant the numbered version. I'm doing the same with sha256 too.