this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
35 points (97.3% liked)
Gaming
20010 readers
2 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So basically they just did an "upscale" remaster of the original, rather than using the assets and engine from RDR2? (Which is annoying because pretty much all of New Austin was built out)
The development cost for building it out in the new engine would probably be an order of magnitude higher than the simple upscale.
If they thought they'd get an order of magnitude more sales from doing things that way, they'd have done it that way.
I'm with you, though. I'd love a proper remaster that also came as a native PC edition.