this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)
Hardware
5011 readers
1 users here now
This is a community dedicated to the hardware aspect of technology, from PC parts, to gadgets, to servers, to industrial control equipment, to semiconductors.
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to electronic hardware
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Did I read that right...128 cores / 256 threads. That's bonkers. I guess those are only useful in extremely parallel workloads, or you'll be hitting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl%27s_law limitations? I'm not a CS grad, so take this with a pinch of salt.
This is also a way to get around software that's licensed per socket instead of per core. Allows companies to condense the number of machines and licenses.
Yeah, at that thread count only a few workstation applications (maybe video encoding and code compilation) scale well.
The c in 4c is supposedly referring to cloud where it's possible to run 128 tiny independent VMs on a chip like that. Being independent means those should scale linearly aside from the shared memory and IO bandwidth.
Those numbers are just so wild. Very impressive :)