this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
24 points (96.2% liked)

Toronto

1621 readers
4 users here now

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Friends:
Support lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By Lucas Powers · CBC News

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MarkG_108@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Important stuff like basic groceries are exempt. Also, there is a tax rebate for those of lower incomes, so its affect is primarily on those who have greater wealth. What's being discussed is a one percent addition; hence, a penny from moneyed spendthrifts for integrity of services within the city. Sounds good to me.

[–] pwnna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure groceries are exempt, but there is a limit on how much you can reasonably spend. At the rate housing and asset prices are, there appears no limit on how much your wealth can grow. So instead of using a proxy metric (spending) to tax people with wealth, just go after it directly instead.

[–] MarkG_108@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're suggesting a municipal income tax? I doubt that would come to fruition. Again, there is a rebate for those in lower incomes, which I believe addresses your initial concern.

[–] pwnna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Not sure how you got to that conclusion. I said wealth, not income. Wealth inequality is not the same as income inequality and taxing incoming doesn't fix wealth inequality. Neither does taxing consumption, as most people tend to horde their wealth in some sort of asset.