this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
63 points (93.2% liked)

Canada

7202 readers
378 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The NWT government and city of Yellowknife are describing in tweets, Instagram messages etc. how to search key evacuation information on CPAC and CBC. The broadcast carriers have a duty to carry emergency information, but Meta and X are blocking links.

While internet access is reportedly limited in Yellowknife, residents are finding this a barrier to getting current and accurate information. Even links to CBC radio are blocked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So what's the situation on Lemmy? Who will pay for this article's link to CBC?

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy is neither large enough nor monetizing our views so it’s outside the scope of the legislation and the new regulations that will need to be written, formally consulted through the Canada Gazette process and then approved by Cabinet. Basically, what Lemmy’s doing is still fair use by a carrier.

As I understand it, the Canadian legislation is different than the Australian one in that the Australian version would just have had a minister name which companies would be subject to the tax.

Canada, having been in trade disputes with the US over ministerial designation processes that can be argued to lack transparency, went a different route that would make the tax come into effect for large platforms, monetizing content without paying the sources/creators.

[–] Spotlight7573@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is monetization required for a site to qualify as a digital news intermediary though? It seems like there just needs to be an imbalance:

https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-18/royal-assent

Application 6 This Act applies in respect of a digital news intermediary if, having regard to the following factors, there is a significant bargaining power imbalance between its operator and news businesses:

(a) the size of the intermediary or the operator;

(b) whether the market for the intermediary gives the operator a strategic advantage over news businesses; and

(c) whether the intermediary occupies a prominent market position.

What happens when a Lemmy instance gets too big?

The legislation talks in effect about market power and the benefit to the carrier itself. Without monetization, there wouldn’t be an issue.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

If an instance is running ads on article summaries then it would be the owner of that instance