this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
35 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

23 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rentar42@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It can’t be that an Ed Sheeran stream is worth exactly the same as a stream of rain falling on the roof," Warner Music Group CEO, Robert Kyncl told Music Business Worldwide earlier this year.

That's hilarious. When they demand too much money it's" as long as the consumers are willing to pay, the price is right", but when the customers decide that their golden goose is only worth as much as some other content that they enjoy then they cry like little babies. Where is "trust the market" now?

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, interesting! At first, I can obviously understand where they are coming from. But what about supply and demand? Isn't value defined by how much someone is willing to pay for it? Who are they to tell us this piece of audio is worth more than that piece of audio, all while consumers value them equally?

I also think it's a bit of an apples to oranges comparison. I assume white noise is consumed in different contexts than pop music. You would probably annoy pop music consumers if you played white noise instead, and vice versa. If that was not the case, from a capitalist perspective, one should really question if Sheeran's high production cost is justified, given a random recording from your backyard achieves the same value.

Another assumption: The value of white noise increases, the more ubiquitous other sounds become. The more the music industry tries to produce and sell and place and shove, the more demand there is for alternatives. Leave me alone, I want to slow down. I care more about the well-being of humanity, of my fellow humans, than I care about the well-being of some industry and rich fucks. I read this story with delight. The sounds of nature are a treasure worth seeking, a source of health and serenity which will possibly always be unparalleld by artists.