this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
42 points (81.8% liked)

Australia

3564 readers
51 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/1198065

We can and should be allowed to drive faster on our freeways and motorways; but don’t think governments will let it happen overnight.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dillekant 30 points 1 year ago (9 children)

The faster you go above 80 you use exponentially more energy. Invest in public transport you knobs.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You don't use exponentially more fuel, but cubically. Exponentially is not just a word for "quickly", but a function.
And anyways, that isn't only the case for speeds higher than 80, but for every higher speed. So it's not like there is an objective sweet spot.

[–] dillekant 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The 80 kph rule of thumb is actually part of the design parameters of most regular cars. They are built to be most fuel efficient at 80 (or probably more accurately aerodynamic designed for 80).

I was using exponential colloquially (and fair cop given its usage during Covid), but I think you're just using cubic as a rough guide also due to air resistance. I'd note there are no extra gears at the higher speeds, so you're probably less efficient on the tyres etc.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

I didn't know about that. Thanks, that's interesting! Sorry if I sounded a little condescending, I didn't intend to.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And cubic just means an exponent of 3, which is one kind of exponential relation.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

No, exponential is N^x^, polynomial growth takes the form x^N^, and in the case of a cubic, N is 3. Exponential functions tend to grow much, much faster than polynomial ones.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)