this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
770 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

59483 readers
5393 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kftX@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (15 children)

The end result will likely be something like: "We have investigated ourselves and found that we are blameless of any wrongdoing". Which is usually how these things end up.

Also, weird to not see them saying they'll reach out to Madison to get the story from her, but I guess that might be one of those obvious things so not mentioned. I hope.

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 62 points 1 year ago (10 children)

It being a third-party investigator means they aren't "investigating themselves."

[–] kftX@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

My point is that when you are the one ordering an investigation on yourself, usualyl the results are bound to be highly skewed towards what you want.

I've seen my government recently do this in a pretty big corruption case that would have made heads roll, as well as a couple other private entities I can think of who have hired "outside investigators" to investigate themselves only to go like what I said.

I'm obviously open to being proven wrong in this case, but the track record of such things isn't very positive.

Sorry I wasn't very clear, I just didn't want to make my comment too big.

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Issue is they're trying to investigate something from more than two years ago. They're unlikely to find anything at all in the first place.

[–] kftX@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That's also very true, absolutely not gonna disagree there.

In any case, all we can do is speculate, we will see the end result when it eventually comes out. As long as this brings positive change to LMG as a whole, that'll be good.

I know it won't matter overall, but I won't see the change since I've unsubbed to everything LMG related myself (a long time coming, honestly) but I really do wish them all the best.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)