this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43757 readers
1486 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Leaving the thankless task of moderation to free working volunteers entitles them to secrecy and unaccountability.

Moderation should be crowdsourced subscription service that pays at least minimum wage.

User should directly be able to choose which moderation mask they wish to wear and they should pay for it. If not in real money (because fees and regulations) then at least in some form of actually valuable, redeemable token to compensate moderator for their service.

The user should always have the final work on who and what they don't want to see. Which moderator they subscribe.

Moderation must be transparent, modmail must public.

Moderators should not feel entitled to secrecy or abuse of their position (as would be the case for free work)

There would not be systemic power to wield by the moderators as a class, against the user class or the owner class.

It should ould be possible for a moderator to override or cancel the actions of another moderator. And then it comes to the order of operations in your list of moderator subscriptions.

Lemmy communities should publish a default set of moderators, which the user can pick and choose. Moderators should be able to publish multiple "moderation masks" and you pick which you like the most. Example "everything minus spam" "everything minus spam and sex" "everything minus spam and religion" "everything minus spam, racism, kletophobia and Jeff Bezos" and so on

[–] kiwi@kale.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree except someone has to host the content and they should get to decide what’s not allowed.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think owners should have a say in the content of the discussion. That is something for users and moderators to decide. I have had enough of the "take my ball and go home" situations. Make the database an encrypted blob that cannot be inspected directly.

Alternatively, there is no reason for instances to exist anyway. All computer users have orders of magnitude more compute power to each run their own single user instance. On their five year old phone and even in the dishwasher.

Text is small. Being a hard drive owner would not grant leverage over the freedom of expression of others.

Lemmy is not distributed enough, there is still too much power concentrated in the hands of the owner class and the moderator class.

Users should be their own owners. Moderators will still be needed but they will only operate with the consent of each user to mask off the content they don't want to see.

[–] 14specks@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Tbh it sounds like you really don't like Lemmy and would rather use something else instead

[–] TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You want me to host a community on my phone but only some stranger is allowed to curate the content on it? I don't really understand this system you're describing.

Any lemmeyverse user, including you, would be allowed to emit an opinion regarding moderation actions that would be performed on it.

In the same way votes are currently emitted, moderation actions should be "emitted" and every user can decide to follow, or override or have any kind of rule to interpret those actions.

For instance, a rule could be, if 100 users have emitted "delete" then enact this action in my locally filtered view.

load more comments (5 replies)