this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
86 points (93.9% liked)

Linus Tech Tips

3784 readers
2 users here now

~~⚠️ De-clickbait-ify the youtube titles or your post will be removed!~~

~~Floatplane titles are perfectly fine.~~

~~LTT/LMG community. Brought to you by ******... Actually, no, not this time. This time it's brought to you by Lemmy, the open communities and free and open source software!~~

~~If you post videos from Youtube/LTT, please please un-clickbait the titles. (You can use the title from https://nitter.net/LTTtranslator/ but it doesn't seem to have been updated in quite some while...)~~

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sackbut@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is watching this video considered piracy if there are no ads to skip over?

[–] hangyor@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This comment is where LTT started going down for me.

[–] penguin@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

I listened to an episode of the wan show once and I was out. He showed such disdain for his own audience.

Someone gave like $100 or something insane for a super chat question and he was rude to them.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bro, the simple fact that Linus failed to recognize that ads are most of the time forced on you, with no paid opt-out alternative, had me cursing at him.

It's not piracy if I can't pay to get the product unaltered. PERIOD.

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YouTube premium is exactly that though, isn't it? Not that I agree with either side, just trying to comprehend

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

YouTube premium is supposed to be this, but it is apparently glitching enough that you get plenty of results for "YouTube premium still showing ads" web searches, and it does nothing against sponsor spots.

I would shut up if Google implemented a sponsor block feature for premium users, and fixed their ads showing to (too many) premium subscribers. Buy they don't. As it stands, paying for premium to opt-out from ads is as efficient as using DoNotTrack (which is effectively just added data for fingerprinting) to opt-out from tracking. It makes you part of the problem when you clearly intend to be part of the solution. 🤷‍♂️

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh. I've had Premium for years and never once had it show me ads anyway. Crazy that other people have.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can make a Google search and find almost anything, just because a handful of people claim to have an issue doesn't mean that there really is one. You can find issues with any service. This point is incredibly overblown. Also if you sign up for premium and it's still showing you ads you can contact support or cancel it. That said, I've had premium for a couple years now and have never seen an ad. I mostly use it because we watch a lot of YouTube on our Roku and there is no way around ads on that without premium.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] sverit@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

And linus' response to it is the same smug doublespeak as he's using now. God I hate this dude.