Source with additional images and information. I believe the images were taken on Friday.
Edit:
English translation via Google. Thank you zero_gravitas for providing this.
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
21 points (81.8% liked)
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs
1229 readers
23 users here now
A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.
New to Lemmy?
See the Getting Started Guide
Want Disclosure?
Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.
Community Spotlight
Featured Posts and User Investigations
Useful Links
- UAP Guide
- Disclosure Diaries
- UAP Timeline
- UFOs Wiki
- MUFON - Mutual UFO Network
- Investigate a Sighting
- Report a Sighting
Community Rules
- Follow the Code of Conduct.
- Posts must be on-topic.
- No duplicate posts.
- No commercial activity.
- No memes.
- Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
- Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
- Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
- Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
- Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.
Other Communities
If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It reminds me of messed up panoramic pictures
Same exact thought. I took a panoramic photo on a gondola and nabbed another one on its way past me. Literally looks like this.
The ground below, sky above, smoke around it, is continous and not sharp edged.
Could be an object that was quickly moving by during the panorama I guess though.
Why couldnt this just be photoshop? I mean we have no evidence he took pictures of anything, this could be faked in about 3 seconds in any photo editor software. I might accept video evidence, considering how many shots he got of it, it would not take long on any phone to switch from picture you video. So Im not sure why he wouldnt do that, except that its harder to fake video than pictures.
Without more evidence, this really amounts to nothing.