sh.itjust.works Main Community

7701 readers

1 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

manifex@sh.itjust.works

biela@sh.itjust.works

imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works

De-federate from instances with loli (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by InfiniteVariables@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works

129 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Can we get a consensus on whether our community should de-federate with servers that host loli? I personally think we should block them, and if that ends up not being the consensus here then I'll probably sign up on another server. I hope we can all agree to set that boundary though because I like it here and it seems otherwise pretty cool.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] delmain@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean yeah of course. That character is actually a 9000-year old vampire, not a child

[–] birdmancaw@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh come on, the examples I gave are one in their twenties, one in college, and one who's a god. Their stories completely revolve around them being their ages. You are doing the exact conflating of the two I was talking about.

[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with you technically kinda, but the average person doesn't (and never will) see a difference and trying to explain it just makes it seem to them that you are defending it.

If a normal person sees it and says .. "thats wrong" then it shouldn't be included in a default feed.

[–] birdmancaw@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wasn't even talking about whether or not it should be included in the feed. I was just saying their definition is completely wrong. Defining things improperly is the basis for spreading misinformation about something.

[–] Faceman2K23@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and I'm saying that sometimes the definition is irrelevant in the eyes of public opinion. If a character looks like a child, then that is all that matters.

[–] birdmancaw@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But when somebody is literally asking for the definition of something, and the wrong definition is given, that's not a visual perception issue, that's misinformation.

BTW: thank you for actually talking about this. Most people nowadays are too pig headed to have an actual conversation.