this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
85 points (73.5% liked)

Technology

34904 readers
282 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quicksand@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you know why we generally don't use DisplayPort instead of HDMI? I'm always interested in how lesser technologies proliferate.

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

HDMI came from the TV manufacturers and was earlier than DP. While DP came from VESA and Computer OEMs.

HDMI being in TVs gave it a far wider penetration in the consumer market, and so when people wanted to hookup their laptops and other devices to TVs, they'd need HDMI.

Ironically, as ports have been simplified to almost just USB-C on many devices, DP's market share actually grows as it's cheaper and easier to include for OEMs, and if the consumer has to buy an adapter anyway, it might as well be on their dime to pay for HDMI, rather than the phone or laptop maker.

[–] Zeroxxx@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

HDMI came around four years earlier than Display Port, so one of the reasons is that it has been around longer, therefore allowed mass adoption, first mover advantage.

[–] quicksand@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ahh makes sense. Seems like USB A vs C a little bit. Except C is so much better I get to deal with both lol

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In that case, USB A came out right 20(?) years earlier than C - I'm guessing here, don't slay me.

There were USB patches for windows 95 to add the support in

[–] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

USB A came out right 20(?) years earlier than C - I’m guessing here, don’t slay me.

Pretty close. It's debatable at exactly what moment a cable "comes out" (is it when the specification is finalized? When it's published? When device manufacturing starts? When a popular consumer device first has it?) but my personal opinion is 1996 and 2017 for USB-A and USB-C, so 21 years difference.

And here I was concerned about exaggerating...