this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
578 points (94.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43916 readers
1484 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As a species we need a mix of progressive and conservative people. Progressives act as a sort of antennae force finding new ways to approach the world while conservatives are there for if we progress in a way that is ultimately harmful. Finding the right balance and control system is the hard part, not fitting everyone into a progressive or conservative ideology
We need less progressives and less conservatives. What we need more of is radicals.
You're thinking in terms of political ideology a radical progressive is someone taking out all the stops to fix things. It's a bell curve not a checkbox saying what alignment you are
"Progressive" is merely another word for reformist... ie, people who will (at best) achieve absolutely nothing except the continuation of "business as usual."
What meagre labor protections (for instance) the working class in the west has wasn't won because of reformists... it was won in spite of them by militant and thoroughly radical labor organising.