this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
881 points (99.1% liked)

World News

38965 readers
2550 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 106 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Damn. These are Eastern Europe levels of corruption. Has it only gotten this bad in the past few years or were Cameron/Blair/Major etc. just better at hiding it?

[–] JdW@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it got significantly worse for two reasons:

Trump showed that operating outside morals or regulations had no consequences, political or financial.

A kleptrocrat is now in the highest office, instead of just pulling strings.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with the first point but Rishi definitely isn't the first kleptrocrat in the job (he might be the richest, but not the first), we have a glorious (/s) history of being ruled over by the rich and privileged (not only in parliament, but the rest of government and of course the royals).

[–] JdW@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You are correct in essence, I was taking a bit of a shortcut, but Rishi is definately unique in that he is a step up in wealth compared to the traditional Old Boys Network. Ironically that's the only level up the UK has accomplished since Boris XD

So yes, the rich and privileged have always been the ruling class, once the Millionaires get replaced by Billionaires the rules, and playing field, changes dramatically.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't disagree, maybe I'm just more cynical about how bad it has been already, millionaire, billionaire, both are so many magnitudes of wealth above what we'll ever have, and are both as disconnected from the rest of us, not to mention both are already funded by and/or are otherwise in bed with the billionaires that aren't in government, so it doesn't feel like this is the big shift that'll make the difference.

[–] JdW@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, it was bad already. But what most people do not realize how far removed from the "real" world that you, me and yes-millionaires inhabit the multibillionaires are. The "out of touch" elite of the old rich and powerful did exist in the same framework we did. The megarich do not. The difference between indirect influence and direct power might seem trivial but I am convinced it's not just fundamentally different but also potentially catastrophic as they might as well be a different species from us for all practical purposes and to have them make decisions that directly influence our lifes but not theirs is Kafkaesque.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Again, I don't fundamentally disagree, I just think things are already much worse than you're giving them credit for, and that the person of the top of the capitalism pile being even richer than the others doesn't have as much of a direct impact on those of us already being fucked by the rich for it to matter.

The idea that someone like Boris or Cameron, or any of the royals, has any idea how people like you and me live is just as absurd as if it's Rishi.

Othering them (they are absolutely not a different species) and pretending as if the catastrophe isn't already here (and that Rishi or not, we've been ruled over by billionaires for as long as there have been billionaires) just seems to me to be focusing on the wrong part of it all (one individual instead of the system that enables him to exist at all), and is counterproductive.

[–] JdW@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We have come to fundamentally different insight into the psyches of the rich and the ultra rich. There's a reason I say that for me they might as well be adiiferent species, we'll see in the fullness of time how this develops. Both the system and the individual in it can be problem. Glossing over an, in my mind, fundamental difference is a mistake. But that's my opinion of course. It's clear you do not get my argument and that's that.

I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this subject. Fact is that the world is in serious peril, and the foundations of our system are shaking at its core.

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I think probably a bit of both. The Conservatives seem to have done away with the concept of political embarrassment except as a political tool in itself.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think we've been on a quick spiral towards seeing just how much the electorate would deal with.

There are deep parallels with Trumpists and Brexiteers in that their following is almost religious. Pair this with the fact that the UK doesn't have a constitution, and we've found that it doesn't actually matter if a PM is found to have misled parliament or have been charged by the police for an offence. Politicians can get away with whatever they want, including breaking the law, and people will still rather vote for them.