sh.itjust.works Main Community

7669 readers

14 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

manifex@sh.itjust.works

biela@sh.itjust.works

imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works

111

does sh.itjust.works allow criticism of CCP? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago by wriggly3171@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works

245 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have seen that the lemmy.ml mods will openly ban discussion about the CCP. I am wondering if the sh.itjust.works team allows criticism of government bodies, while still banning racism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who is that? It's a cool sci-fi name.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Founder of the shill think thank "Victims of Communism" and close collaborator of the Falun Gong cult who is behind the vast majority of the reports on the Uygur situation. You make of that what you will.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Zenz

[–] snakesnakewhale@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I read the article and I still can't tell if we like the guy or not. Wikipedia makes it sound like he's not pro-CCP.

[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Adrian Zenz is not pro-CCP but it seems like wildbus8979 probably is. It is worth pointing out that the Uighur situation is getting much different treatment by the media than genocides by western nations. Not to mention American imperialism etc.

That's not really the point though. The point is, CCP censorship and wildbus8979 is at the very least, completely missing that point.

[–] snakesnakewhale@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Ah, I see. I was a bit confused because it seemed like wildbus8979 was simultaneously calling Zenz a bad guy and a pro-Uighur guy, which wouldn't track coming from an anti-CCP guy.

[–] novel_difficulty_512@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's because the treatment of Uighurs by the CCP government is in many ways without parallel and thus needs to be treated differently.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You can not be pro CPP and still question western propaganda, crazy huh? 🤷

I think the Arab League probably knows better than some fucking fascist and a weird ass cult. But you believe what you want... Not to say that I think things aren't complex in the region, but I think the west purposefully misrepresents the reality.

I enjoyed watching Naomi «Sexy Cyborg» Wu's videos in Xinjiang, her girlfriend is Uighur and they seemed to have no issues walking around.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0zSi3juMa4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ws-I64v4XI8

[–] spark431@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Just want to point out, Naomi Wu is not the best person to point out when it comes to defending China: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naomi_Wu

[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Yep, you can be both. I'm both. It's just that you seem really interested in trying to make people believe there's nothing going on with the Uighurs in China... No matter how many propaganda videos you post there is much more evidence to the contrary.

You shouldn't trust western media fully either but if you're fully buying that China isn't doing anything wrong then you're either very gullible or arguing in bad faith.