this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
562 points (95.5% liked)

> Greentext

7452 readers
35 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The common debate is that the bombs didn’t exactly force Japan to surrender, and that it was the threat of the imminent USSR participation in the war that did.

I believe the reason for this is that there are transcripts as well as timelines of the Japanese government’s upper echelons that sort of demonstrate the bombs didn’t have as big of an impact on them as a potential USSR participation.

But the whole thing is a bit hazy, and I have no doubts the bombs at the very least put a big amount of pressure on the Japanese government at the time.

[–] Dreyns@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

From what I know there was a big "they only got one" mentality that pushes them to surrender when they realised they were wrong.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm lead to understand that using them on Japan wasn't really about Japan either. US officials knew that following the war, things were going to go south with the USSR, and so used the bombs as a show of force to the Russians.