this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
20 points (83.3% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
54636 readers
873 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I torrent with a VPN and without port forwarding and can saturate my 20Mbps up and 100Mbps of my 300Mbps down. I don't think port forwarding is the issue.
OP had a different issue (see comments further below). They throttled themselves by severely limiting their own upload speed in the torrent client.
That aside you can always torrent without a port forward but the speeds & connectivity will heavily depend on other peers present in the torrent swarm. You're relying on other connectable peers in the torrent swarm to be able to download torrent data through. If they don't exist, or there's not many of them, then you will have performance issues.
e.g. In large torrent swarms you may not notice much difference since there should be plenty of other connectable peers to make direct connections with. The smaller the torrent swarm the less likely you'll find as many connectable peers which can lead to slower speeds.
And in much smaller swarms without any connectable peers you won't be able to download anything at all - All the firewalled (not connectable, not port forwarded) peers can see each other but they cannot initiate a data transfer until a connectable peer joins the swarm.