this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
51 points (94.7% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
263 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Court rules judge can hear case that alleges appointment of Mary Simon violates constitutional rules for bilingualism

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The people launching the suits are hardcore Quebecoise rights activists:

The lawsuit was launched by two Quebecers’ rights associations, including Justice pour le Québec, which was led by Frédéric Bastien until his death earlier this year.

...

In 2020, [Bastien] filed a complaint after the Canadian Human Rights Commission failed to provide a French version of a federal challenge to Quebec’s secularism law.

Two years later, Bastien filed a human rights complaint for racism after being denied a job opportunity as a white man. The role was only open to women, Indigenous people, people with disabilities and people of colour.

There are undoubtedly Indigenous candidates who would meet the constitutional requirements. It's worth asking why the government didn't bother to select one of them.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's just, you know. Quebec is the product of colonialism as well. Perhaps they should let this one slide. Let Mary Simon give all her public addresses in Inuktitut if that will make it seem more fair.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I agree completely.

From what I understand, they have a different point of view: Quebec won concessions by surrendering to the British, and they see those concessions being eroded.

When it comes to a ceremonial position that is otherwise ignored, it would look way better to concede and take the L. But I think they're afraid this is a slippery slope.