this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
210 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
580 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some staff members were alerted on Wednesday they were “not currently meeting our expectation of joining your colleagues in the office at least three days a week”, according to emails shared with the Financial Times. The emails were also discussed on the anonymous corporate message board platform Blind.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemmylaugh@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] TheHalc@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Maybe for a small number of companies in a small number of industries, but most companies rent their office premises, even large companies.

I've worked at several multinational companies that sold their HQ buildings when they recognised that building management was not a core competence for them and tying up capital in real estate has a significant opportunity cost for them.

It's no skin off their noses if commercial real estate plummets in value - if anything, it would be in their favour as their rent would decrease.

[–] falsem@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Amazon owns a lot of their office buildings

[–] TheHalc@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Amazon is shitting money. They're not exactly a typical company.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)