this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
1880 points (93.1% liked)

Memes

45589 readers
1291 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1880
2023-08-09.jpg (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Samsy@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Considering how there's almost no computers anymore with such limited resources that they can't store a string or convert to one, it's kind of crazy anybody bothers with the ambiguity of using numbers for the month.

[–] scubbo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The limited resource is not Compute Power, but Engineer time. Sure, you could ask someone to implement wrappers everywhere in the system so that the display is human-readable - or you could put one label somewhere clarifying the date format to readers.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Implement wrappers everywhere? Why can't they just write a single function that takes an ISO date a spits out a string (human readable) date? I'd put money down that such a function already exists in almost every library that deals with dates.

[–] scubbo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That's why I said "implement" and not just "write". The process of wiring in that existing function has non-negligible cost, as does keeping it updated/patched.

Sure, it should be pretty small - but it's non-zero. Is it worth it? That's a product decision.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Hmm good point actually