this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
302 points (94.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6592 readers
771 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Second amendment means we should have anti-aircraft missiles too. This is not a joke. I am serious.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Honestly, even if it were legal, who would be able to afford it? It'd just mean the ultra wealthy would have even more powerful private armies. A single missile costs at least a few hundred thousand dollars, with some systems costing millions per missile. Which is unfathomably expensive when you think of what you can buy with a few million dollars.

[–] JebKush@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The answer is UBI: Universal Ballistic Income

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't that just a fancy term for shooting rolls of coins at people with a slingshot?

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Afraid of the increasing missile street violence? Call now and buy your own handheld missile launcher today at 50% discount. The best way to stop a bad guy with a missile launcher is a good guy with a missile launcher.

[–] Udonezo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is what organized militias are for. Crowdfunding and rigourous oversight

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago

The free market is very good at reducing prices. Do you really think the price the government pays for missiles is reasonable?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anti-aircraft missiles, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear SAMs, shall not be infringed.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Play it again, SAM.

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Shadow wizard money gang (we love casting spells) LEGALISE NUCLEAR BOMBS

[–] PutangInaMo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

When are you announcing your presidential run?