lemmy.ml meta

1406 readers

1 users here now

Anything about the lemmy.ml instance and its moderation.

For discussion about the Lemmy software project, go to !lemmy@lemmy.ml.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

nutomic@lemmy.ml

172

lemmy.ml is migrated to a new server (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by nutomic@lemmy.ml to c/meta@lemmy.ml

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Its now running on a dedicated server with 6 cores/12 threads and 32 gb ram. I hope this will be enough for the near future. Nevertheless, new users should still prefer to signup on other instances.

This server is financed from donations to the Lemmy project. If you want to support it, please consider donating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ccunix@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I haven't dug into the bowels of lemmy, but is there anything to be gained by scaling horizontally?

[–] copylefty@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Probably, but it's significantly more difficult to set up and maintain, and introduces new problems. I'm sure it'll be considered once they reach the limits of what a single node can handle.

[–] DrownedAxolotl@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I assume it's for the sake of more freedom. Without admins to make troubling choices like in the case of reddit, lemmy can't be corrupt so easily. I'm quite new to this as well, but from what I've seen, the most lemmy can do is unlink certain instances so they don't show up in your search, but instances may live or die, but the social network as a whole lives on (except if the killed instance housed your account).

[–] copylefty@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

They meant horizontally scaling this instance (multiple servers serving the same app)