this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
1076 points (98.6% liked)
Games
32960 readers
1828 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pokémon is regularly one of the best selling games out there, so saying most people don't want turn-based RPGs doesn't sound right.
Pokemon is so much less complex than BG3. It's a bad comparison. If you exclude competitive pokemon, which 99% of people never engage with.
I consider computer RPGs to be more in the vein of tactical RPGs rather than Pokemon/Final Fantasy style turn based RPGs tbh. It's turn based, but positioning is key. Or, at least they scratch the same itch for me.
And Fire Emblem, XCOM, FF Tactics, etc have never exactly had mind blowing sales.
In some ways I agree they are pretty different, but fixating too much on particularities while glossing over core mechanics is a bit strange. We have space for a plethora of FPSs and action games of different styles, why are turn-based RPGs dismissed like this on a regular basis? Every gen or so we have yet another reminder that, yes, people do still like RPGs.
Baldur's Gate may not have all ages cutesy characters, but D&D-style fantasy has its own appeal.
These things don't necessarily follow one from another. Just because many fans are casual players, it doesn't mean they don't have a liking for the genre. D&D is not inherently repealing to the same group either. As much as Baldur's Gate targets an adult audience, Pokémon as a series is over 25 years old, there is a sizable number of adult players. Not only there is an overlap, the differences may make it appealing to players with differing interests too.
Mind you, I am an adult Pokémon fan who plays D&D. As much as I understand that not everyone is like me, it's not like Pokémon fans all evaporate when they hit 18, or they never again care for turn-based games.
Ultimately, the success of the game vindicates that there are people who want that.
There's definitely some overlap. Almost all D&D players have played at least one pokemon game at this point. Hell even us old M:TG holdouts that thought that "Pokemon was for kids" when it came out when we were teens played Pokemon GO, though I know enough to know that PG wasn't really a pokemon game.
I will admit that D&D players still make a minority of Pokemon players, but I maintain that's mostly because people think D&D is way more complicated than it actually is. The rule books don't help here. In all actuality most players will never read most of those books, because 90% of the "rules" won't apply to your game.
No, but they're both turn based rpgs?
Are you really gatekeeping a video game