this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
349 points (90.5% liked)

Privacy

32109 readers
815 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm surprised that Vivaldi isn't more popular next to Brave tbh.

You get Chromium with a bunch of other features if you want them, but no crypto crap. They even run their own Mastodon instance with built-in functionality out of the box.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's closed source, which is a big turn off for a lot of people. I do prefer Vivaldi though, largely because their business model is vastly superior. Employee owned and self funded vs crypto/advertising/investor mix? Easy choice.

EDIT: To be clear, I still use Firefox 99.99% of the time. Vivaldi and Brave are only competing for that 0.01% where I have a problem with Firefox on a particular website and can't find a solution.

[–] FarLine99@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Vivaldi has way worse adblock compared to Brave. Not a replacement.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brave's ad-blocker is better than uBlock Origin?

[–] FarLine99@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are some places where yes. Brave has VERY good, balanced ad blocker built-in.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I guess my point was that adding uBlock Origin to Vivaldi is a simple 5 second process, so the claim that it is unsuitable as a replacement for Brave because the default ad/tracker blocker is less effective seems kind of pointless.

[–] cmrss2@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By default, sure. But uBlock is way more powerful when you configure it. Seriously, take a look at their wiki. I doubt that Brave lets you choose exactly which domains to connect to on a per-site basis. And do you really want an advertising company to make your adblocker? They’ve done shadier stuff.

[–] FarLine99@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Their point is to be an ethical ad company. So i still kinda trust them. Also, I use Firefox + uBlock Origin on Hard Mode both on PC and Android. Brave has really good, balanced ad blocker which does not break sites but block ads and trackers.

[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Why wouldn't you just install uBlock Origin on them though?

[–] Xelnoc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Is vivaldi still closed-source?

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Vivaldi is pretty and has some excellent features.

But it is one of the absolute worst when it comes to privacy.

Not that their privacy policy is horrible, but the browser leaks so much data by default it's ridiculous.

Vivaldi also, by default, saves all your session data. All of it.

chrome://chrome-urls/ > vivaldi://sync-internals/